The value of Wound, Ischemia and foot Infection classification in patients undergoing endovascular therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia and foot infection (WIfI) classification system and clinical outcomes for 1-year limb amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from reintervention, and wound healing rate in a cohort of patients affected by chronic limb-threatening ischemia treated exclusively by endovascular procedures. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective, consecutive cohort of 203 patients (203 limbs) who underwent infrainguinal endovascular revascularization at a single center between March 2018 and January 2021. These patients were stratified into clinical stages 1 to 4 based on the SVS WIfI classification and categorized into two groups: WIfI 1 to 3 (n = 101 limbs) and WIfI 4 (n = 102 limbs). The SVS objective performance goals of 1-year limb AFS, freedom from reintervention, and wound healing were compared between the groups and assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Angiographic lesion characteristics and angioplasty details were compared. RESULTS: The average age was 72.4 years (44.3% male, 85.2% had hypertension, 80.3% had diabetes, and 87.7% had tissue loss). There were statistical differences between the groups in 1-year limb AFS Kaplan-Meier rate between WIfI clinical stages 1 to 3 group and WIfI clinical stage 4 group (82% vs 66%, respectively; P < .001), but there was no statistical difference in freedom from reintervention and wound healing rates between the groups (70% vs 64% [P = .62] and 74% vs 79% [P = .90], respectively). Owing to angiographic lesion characteristics, femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal segment distributions were similar between the groups, but there was a statistical difference in target lesion location to tibial vessels (55.4% vs 71.6%, respectively; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia, SVS WIfI clinical stage 4 had worse results in the 1-year limb AFS rate, but there was no statistical difference in freedom from reintervention and wound healing rates between the groups.

The importance of the superficial and profunda femoris arteries in limb salvage following endovascular treatment of chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the long-term limb salvage, survival and patency rates of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) when outflow was achieved through the profunda femoris artery (PFA) only vs both the PFA and superficial femoral artery (SFA). METHODS: From January 2008 to July 2016, patients with AIOD who underwent aortoiliac angioplasty at the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil, were classified into two groups according to whether they had femoral outflow via the PFA only (group 1) or both the PFA and SFA (group 2) in the affected leg. The primary outcome was amputation-free survival. The secondary outcomes were the patency and overall survival rates. RESULTS: In total, 69 aortoiliac angioplasties were performed in 69 patients: 22 patients (31.8%) in group 1 and 47 (67.2%) in group 2. A total of 12 reinterventions (17.4%) were performed, seven (31.8%) in group 1 and five (10.2%) in group 2, without statistical significance between the groups (P = .063). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2500 ± 880.5 days. Both the primary and secondary patency rates analyzed at 1800 days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (80.2% vs 82.3%; P = .80 and 84.7% vs 97.6%; P = .10, respectively). Furthermore, the limb salvage rates at 1800 days were similar between groups 1 and 2 (91.3% vs 86.1%; P = .60), as were the survival rates (74.7% vs 78%; P = .80). The Bollinger score was worse in group 1 (P = .001), as expected, because of occlusion of the SFA. However, the PFA and popliteal artery scores were similar between the two groups. Occlusion of the SFA did not influence the limb salvage rate according to univariate analysis (P = .509) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = .671). CONCLUSIONS: The patency of the SFA does not interfere with the outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic AIOD. The PFA in conjunction with the popliteal artery as the sole outflow route for iliac endovascular treatment is associated with similar patency, survival, and limb salvage rates as those for outflow through both the PFA and SFA.

Number of infrapopliteal arteries undergoing endovascular treatment is not associated with the limb salvage rate in patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the number of infrapopliteal arteries undergoing endovascular treatment is associated with the limb salvage rate in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS: This was a retrospective, consecutive cohort study of CLI patients who underwent infrapopliteal angioplasty at the Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Service of the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, between January 2009 and January 2013. The primary outcome variable was the limb salvage rate. The secondary outcome variables were patency, survival, plantar arch quality, and operative mortality rate. RESULTS: Overall, 109 infrapopliteal angioplasties were performed in 92 patients, and the initial technical success rate was 95.6%. Based on the analyses of the arteriography of the endovascular procedures, the patients were classified into two groups according to whether they had undergone endovascular treatment of one artery (group 1) or two arteries (group 2). The mean outpatient follow-up time was 430 ± 377.5 days. The analyses were performed at 180 and 360 days. There were 72 angioplasties (66%) in group 1 and 37 (34%) in group 2. Hypertension was more frequent in group 1 (93.1%) than in group 2 (78.4%; P = .03). Other clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of acute kidney failure was lower in group 1 (0% vs 8.1%, respectively; P = .037). The limb salvage rate at 360 days was similar in groups 1 and 2 (89.4% vs 89.3%, respectively; P = .595). The secondary patency rate at 360 days was also similar in groups 1 and 2 (59.9% vs 60.9%, respectively; P = .571). The perioperative mortality rate was lower in group 1 (4.2% vs 16.2%, respectively; P = .039), but the survival rate at 360 days was similar in both groups (82.1% vs 75.1%, respectively; P = .931). The frequencies of complete, incomplete, and absent plantar arch were similar in both groups. The estimated limb salvage rates for patients with complete plantar arch or incomplete/absent plantar arch were 96.2% and 84.6%, respectively (P = .467), at 360 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is not necessary to treat the largest number of arteries possible in CLI patients. Instead, the most amenable artery for endovascular procedures should be treated to improve limb salvage and secondary patency rates.